I'm doing more pods than Invasion of the Body Snatchers!

Hi All,

Just finished my third podcast in two days. This one was the Drunken Housewife, where I and the delightful Ian and Sarah Kennedy discussed Project Suicide, my writer’s journey, theater, and more. It was a hoot. Before that, it was Michael on Beside the Lamp, and Todd Schowalter on The Right Mind. I’ll publicize air dates when available.

Don’t forget about the upcoming book club talk on September 8. If you’re in the Knoxville area and want to hear me speak about Project Suicide, just let me know. I’ll also be signing copies and will have a few for sale.

Checkout Time has moved into the technical edit stage. When that’s done, it’s off to my publisher and his editor to get drummed into shape for publication. I’ll keep you all apprised.

I’m hoping to hear back soon on several short stories I’ve submitted to magazines, anthologies, and contests. Keep your fingers crossed.

I’m still looking for more book reviews. You can easily post them by clicking on   www.projectsuicidenovel.com and going to the very bottom of the Amazon page. Please give it a rating and a few lines. People often base their buying decisions on number and quality of reviews.

Thanks and stay tuned!

John Bukowski

Johnb@thrillerjohnb.net

PS. If you know anyone who might enjoy following my writer’s journey, please forward them this opt in link. https://tremendous-motivator-8914.ck.page/95736090a5

 

If drama is conflict, then the human condition offers fertile ground for writers

I really used to like Star Trek the Next Generation. Still do. Gene Roddenberry built a world where strife had been removed. People didn’t struggle for money, food, or power. There was no jealousy or greed. Yet, every episode dealt with some elements of these. Why? Because drama is conflict, and conflict is human nature.

Human beings come with great virtues and great flaws. Lately, it has become fashionable to suggest that the flaws only apply to certain groups or certain times. But history teaches that human nature transcends time, space, race, and ethnicity. While it is true that North America had slavery, so did Islamic Africa, Incan South America, and (to an extent) Eastern Europe. Racism was present in KKK members, Indian brahmans, Nazi stormtroopers, and soldiers of the Japanese empire. The Boers persecuted the Zulu just as the Zulu viciously conquered their neighbors. Cortez brutally conquered Mexico, just as the Aztecs did centuries before. Copious blood gets spilled today on the streets of Odessa and those of Chicago. Whatever the time or society, there are always those greedy for power, money, or revenge. Always some person or group thinks they know the way and that all others should be forced to follow. That was and is the dark side of human nature.

All this is grist for the writer’s mill. We can try and write around it, pretend racism, greed, violence, lust, and thirst for power no longer exist, or only exist in certain groups or peoples. But if we do, we risk losing the basic truthfulness that is at the heart of good writing.

Readers are human (most of them anyway 😊). As human beings, they are drawn to strong emotions such as violence and unbridled passion. Characters like James Bond, Jack Reacher, and Rambo are popular because they are violent men of action. Christian Grey has appeal because of his carnal appetites. Serial killers like Hannibal Lecter are fascinating because they tap into that dark half of human nature. To paraphrase Stephen King, writers must let that dark-half beast out of the cage. If not, the work itself will be constrained and unauthentic.

As writers, we mustn’t censor ourselves. We mustn’t become so obsessed with not offending that we create watered-down, unrealistic characters and events. We mustn’t rewrite history to fit modern sensibilities. We mustn’t build bland worlds devoid of human frailty and human greatness. We mustn’t demonize one group in order to idolize another. We need to show the whole of human character, warts and all. To do so should not be thought of as offensive, crude, or unfeeling. It is simply truthful writing. For, although it may be fiction, it must maintain universal truth at its core. And what could be truer or more universal than human nature.

 

I'm going to be on a cinema podcast in September.

Hi All,

I’m going to be on the Andrew Stamper Cinema Podcast in September. We’ll be taping in early August. Given that I’m a thriller writer, we’re going to be discussing one of my favorite thriller movies: Three Days of the Condor. If you haven’t seen it, it’s directed by Sidney Pollack and stars Robert Redford and Faye Dunaway. Definitely four-star fare from 1975.

It’s a political thriller (almost a technothriller) based on the book Six Days of the Condor by James Grady. So, it should be a good tie-in to Project Suicide. Like Deacon Creel, the protagonist, Joe Turner, is caught holding a political hot potato, with nefarious forces trying to kill him. Turner is also a very smart guy, although not quite the genius of a Deacon Creel.  

Anyway, it’s a great movie and should be fun to chat about. As you know, I love talking cinema.

I’ll keep you apprised about the actual airtime in September.

Stay tuned!

Did Atticus Finch fail Tom Robinson?

Project Suicide has been out a month and is doing well. If any of you haven’t had a chance to read it, you can download or get a print copy at www.projectsuicidenovel.com. If you do read it, please review on Amazon.

On another topic, I’m a big fan of Gregory Peck, and of course, To Kill a Mockingbird. Peck gave a brilliant, Oscar-winning performance. But I actually enjoyed the Atticus Finch character more in the novel. To me, the book Atticus was more human, less the saintly figure painted by the movie.

One thing that always bothered me about both novel and movie was “Why did Tom lose his case?” The underlying answer is racism, which is the point of both book and movie. But didn’t Atticus know he was up against that? And faced with that knowledge, did he choose the best defense strategy?

Early in my fiction-writing career, I addressed this issue in a short piece that is a little bit essay, a whole lot short story. If you send me an email (johnb@thrillerjohnb.net) I’ll be happy to send you a copy..

Stay tuned!

John Bukowski

PS. If you know anyone who might enjoy following my writer’s journey, please forward them this link https://tremendous-motivator-8914.ck.page/95736090a5

 

Research doesn't need to be rocket science.

I’ve watched quite a few podcasts, webinars, and blog posts about writing and marketing fiction. Almost all have been informative and well done, the speakers organized and polite. But they are not always as entertaining as they could be. They sometimes lack humor or interesting/humorous stories and anecdotes.  And I always seem to learn more when also entertained.

In that vein, I’m putting together entertaining material about what I’ve learned researching for fiction. As most of you know, I had a long research career that blended into medical writing. During this evolution, I learned to translate technical material into information that is both interesting and understandable to diverse audiences without (and this is key) overwhelming them. This has served me well not only writing technothrillers, but in all types of fiction. Little details about a location, police procedure, or even how to start a tractor add a touch of spice that lends authenticity.  

My goal in putting together My Top Six Tips on Effectively Researching your Novel will codify some of what I learned in an entertaining way. Hopefully, I will be able to spread the word in podcasts, webinars, and blogs.

Stay tuned!

Reads like a movie

If I had a dollar for every time I was told that my writing reads like a movie, I could retire to the mountains. No, wait. 😊 This no doubt reflects a lifetime wasted watching movies and television, or maybe something even better.

I’ve heard several well-published authors say that good fiction (at least of the thriller variety) should have readers watching the movie playing in the author’s head. There may be minor differences in how individual readers perceive characters and scenes, but the major elements should be the same. Evidently, I have a lot of movies playing in my head.

Over the past week, press releases for Project Suicide have gone out to Southwestern Ohio, Detroit Michigan, and Eastern Tennessee. Yesterday, the national release went out to several major venues, including some in the entertainment industry. I know picking up a movie deal is a long shot, but it would certainly be a great way to expand readership.

Wish me luck and stay tuned.

National Press Release

https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/debut-thriller-novel-project-suicide-by-john-bukowski-turns-alzheimers-cure-into-political-assassins-ideal-weapon-301548236.html?tc=eml_cleartime

 

What if a thief hit the jackpot while waiting to rob a casino?

About twenty years ago, I was in a hotel lobby in Las Vegas waiting to meet some friends for dinner. As one is want to do while waiting anywhere in Vegas, I was feeding dollars into a slot machine. I’d allotted myself twenty dollars to blow on slots that day (it’s amazing how casually you toss money around in that town.)

I was looking around for my party, not really paying any attention as the machine ate three bucks for every two it returned. I looked up from checking my watch and noticed that there were jackpot symbols in the first three rows, the last row just a cherry. So close. But wait. This was a special machine, one that hesitated after the wheels stopped before moving the last wheel one space randomly up or down. Just above this last wheel was another jackpot.

For a moment, my heart was in my throat. A fortune hung on the flip of a coin. The last wheel quivered; I held my breath. Then my heart sank as the wheel rose to replace the cherry with a bell. It was a progressive machine, with a jackpot payout of close to three-hundred-sixty-thousand dollars.

What if the coin had flipped heads instead of tails? What would have happened then?

I thought about this through the years. The magic “if” of writing. What if, an ex-con was waiting to rob a casino, one of those smaller joints in Laughlin or Bullhead City. Or maybe one on an Indian reservation. What if that thief was waiting for his partners to show, anxiously passing the time with another bandit--the one-armed variety? What if he hit the big jackpot?

That’s the plot of my next short story, entitled Wheel of Fortune. Hopefully we’ll see if published somewhere in the not-too-distant future.

Stay tuned!

 

Checkout Time!

A few years ago, I was in a hotel room. While lying in bed, I saw that there was a trap door in the ceiling. I remember thinking that someone could hide anything up there--maybe a bomb. As I thought further, I realized that you got metal detected and body scanned boarding a plane, but that you could check into a hotel room toting a backpack nuke. That was the genesis of Checkout Time, a novel I hope to get published in the next year.

I’ve included a jacket blurb below if you’re as intrigued by the idea as I was. Stay tuned!

Checkout Time

Handsome scientist Thomas Tomacinski’s easy-going style has the ladies talking, but beautiful FBI agent Sally Butterworth doesn’t want to join the conversation. Not until they land in the same hotel where an extortion bomber with the mysterious pseudonym Conrad Hilton sparks their romance with a bang. Conrad is looking to make a killing from a consortium of hotel owners -- and is not above killing to make a point.

It won’t be easy stopping Conrad, a genius with a method actor’s ability to assume new identities and personalities. And when this chameleon takes a special interest in Tom and those he cares about, nobody gets much sleep. Tom-tom and Sally Pancakes, as they are affectionately known, are led a merry chase through the scenic backroads of Kentucky and Tennessee, with more plot twists than a country lane. They fall in and out of danger while falling in and out of bed, learning tough lessons about love, loss, and themselves.